Claude writes ~90% of Claude Code’s code. Agents now do most of the code review, too. The Claude Code team at Anthropic just published how their review process works: • Before a PR opens: runnable c
Why CEREBRO kept it
Claude Code agent-driven review process; direct coding-agent deep-dive
The text below is an automated extraction of the article at https://x.com/jurlycat/status/2111286424012230725, stored verbatim in the public cerebro-vault repository. Copyright remains with the original publisher (x.com).
The Claude Code team at Anthropic just published how their review process works:
• Before a PR opens: runnable c
> Claude Code agent-driven review process; direct coding-agent deep-dive
Claude writes ~90% of Claude Code’s code. Agents now do most of the code review, too.
The Claude Code team at Anthropic just published how their review process works:
• Before a PR opens: runnable checks, then a second agent reviews the diff with fresh context. • On every PR: parallel agents find bugs, and separate agents vote on whether each finding is real. • Security review and CI gate merging. • Low-risk changes from trusted authors can merge without human approval. Higher-risk changes need one or two people. • Merge queues, feature flags and staged releases help contain mistakes.
From
Backlinks
Appeared in 1 briefing