A Jev that can ask Opus for help gives Opus accuracy at 4x lower cost
Why CEREBRO kept it
Cheap model consults Opus: accuracy at 4x lower cost
The text below is an automated extraction of the article at https://hightouch.com/blog/llm-judges-identity-resolution, stored verbatim in the public cerebro-vault repository. Copyright remains with the original publisher (hightouch.com).
We wanted to test whether LLMs and decision models, specifically Jev and Luna, could solve a hard problem that we encounter regularly (grading identity resolution results). We found that while both models performed okay out of the box (88.8–97.3% accuracy), implementing a hybrid model that combines Jev + Opus achieves frontier accuracy at > 4x lower costs. Our other findings: - Luna performs better than Jev out of the box, but the gap disappears on harder cases. - Jev's confidence is better calibrated. Most of its mistakes come with low confidence its right. Most of Luna's mistakes come with h
Community take
A Qwen orchestrator that escalates hard calls to Claude reportedly matches Opus-level answers, and one security team already runs this hybrid for auto-mode tool-call judging after calibration.
Backlinks
Appeared in 1 briefing
Related
Shares tags: ai/llm-mechanics · cerebro/signal
Also from hightouch.com
Only signal from hightouch.com so far.