Steven Gonsalvez

Software Engineer

Researchers published the most uncomfortable paper on vibe coding. It’s called 'Is Vibe Coding Safe?' They tested 12 of the most advanced AI coding agents on real-world software tasks. And the find

Why CEREBRO kept it

Safety analysis of real coding agents, directly on vibe-coding research

The text below is an automated extraction of the article at https://x.com/thesupermannx/status/2104104688488443951, stored verbatim in the public cerebro-vault repository. Copyright remains with the original publisher (x.com).

It’s called "Is Vibe Coding Safe?"

They tested 12 of the most advanced AI coding agents on real-world software tasks.

And the find

> Safety analysis of real coding agents, directly on vibe-coding research

Researchers published the most uncomfortable paper on vibe coding.

It’s called "Is Vibe Coding Safe?"

They tested 12 of the most advanced AI coding agents on real-world software tasks.

And the findings are brutal.

The agents are incredibly good at writing code that works. But they are shockingly bad at writing code that is safe.

Claude 4 sonnet running on SWE-agent managed to generate functionally correct code 57% of the time.

But out of those working solutions.. only a miserable 11.8% were actually secure.

Meaning almost 90% of your "working" ai code is silently introducing vulnerabili

Backlinks

Appeared in 1 briefing

Related

Shares tags: ai/agents · cerebro/signal · vibe-coding

Also from x.com